The Beijing Municipal Administration of Parking Management of Motor Vehicles ended its 20-day public consultation yesterday (October 7th), and nearly half of the 354 netizens concentrated their opinions on whether or not to prohibit the use of ground stakes.
The difference between the contents of the additional management contents of the Opinion Draft and the existing methods for the management of the parking facilities of motor vehicles is that the contents of the Opinion Draft are not limited to the parking lot, but also involve some systems such as parking management and parking order.
A total of 34 drafts for consultations related to the responsibilities of the competent authorities of parking management, the introduction of the concept of public car parks, the use of underground space, the informationization of parking services, the differential parking charges, the parking operations, parking fees, etc. content.
The difference between the pros and cons was clear. However, from the perspective of seeking opinions, more than half of the opinions were focused on whether or not to install piles and locks on parking spaces. The second paragraph of Article 23 of the Exposure Draft stipulates that it is forbidden to install ground stakes and ground locks on parking spaces of motor vehicles.
On the first day of solicitation of opinions, this provision caused disagreements and the debate continued until the deadline for solicitation.
Supporters believe that setting up locks has wasted parking resources, disrupted community order, intensified owner conflicts, and created dangers and inconveniences.
Those who disagree with the prohibition of the use of locks across the board think that for those who have purchased property parking spaces or leased parking spaces, it is their right to set up the locks, which should not be prohibited by legislation.
For the issue of residential parking spaces, the Property Law stipulates that the parking spaces and garages planned for parked cars should meet the needs of the owners first within the building zoning. The ownership of parking spaces and garages is stipulated by the parties through sales, bonuses, or rentals.
■Comments Off Ms. Liu: The above-ground space of the community is owned by all owners. The property company or individual private car owners are locked onto the ground to take possession of them. The first is a kind of infringement, and the second is for the elderly and children of the community. Insecurity has come, and even more serious is that the district’s roads have not been wide, and roadsides have been locked again. In the event of special circumstances within the community, fire engines and ambulances are difficult to access. We hope that the government can do so as soon as possible. Take effective measures to solve the problem of residential ground-mounted locks.
Ren Zhongyu: Suggestions (1) For the ground locks installed in public places, it is necessary to resolutely dismantle them in accordance with the law and impose fines. (2) For private residential parking spaces within the residential area, the owner of the parking space is allowed to legally install the lock. (3) For parking spaces belonging to property management and rented by residents in the community, locks should not be installed to improve the efficiency of the use of public resources.
Expert opinion The property parking space should not be locked. Sun Xianzhong, a researcher at the Institute of Law of the Chinese Academy of Social Sciences, has participated in the drafting and discussion of the legislation of the property law on many occasions. He believes that owners’ ownership of the property parking space can exclude others, and the installed piles and locks are The act of exercising ownership does not hinder others. If it is an open public parking space, setting up the ground stakes and locks will affect others and can be prohibited. Regarding the situation of renting parking spaces, Sun Xianzhong believes that during the lease period, the renter also has an exclusive right of use. As long as he has a valid use certificate, he cannot prohibit the setting up of piles and locks.
In the consultation opinions, there was a view that setting up ground stakes and locks on property rights or leased parking spaces may pose dangers to others, such as tripping old people and children, or affecting the passage of emergency vehicles when roads are not open during emergencies. To prevent this kind of problem, the land piles and ground locks should also be prohibited for property rights or leased parking spaces. Sun Xianzhong believes that this argument cannot be established because parking spaces are not roads and can not be constrained by the rules of road access, let alone assumed to be Parking is the road
The difference between the contents of the additional management contents of the Opinion Draft and the existing methods for the management of the parking facilities of motor vehicles is that the contents of the Opinion Draft are not limited to the parking lot, but also involve some systems such as parking management and parking order.
A total of 34 drafts for consultations related to the responsibilities of the competent authorities of parking management, the introduction of the concept of public car parks, the use of underground space, the informationization of parking services, the differential parking charges, the parking operations, parking fees, etc. content.
The difference between the pros and cons was clear. However, from the perspective of seeking opinions, more than half of the opinions were focused on whether or not to install piles and locks on parking spaces. The second paragraph of Article 23 of the Exposure Draft stipulates that it is forbidden to install ground stakes and ground locks on parking spaces of motor vehicles.
On the first day of solicitation of opinions, this provision caused disagreements and the debate continued until the deadline for solicitation.
Supporters believe that setting up locks has wasted parking resources, disrupted community order, intensified owner conflicts, and created dangers and inconveniences.
Those who disagree with the prohibition of the use of locks across the board think that for those who have purchased property parking spaces or leased parking spaces, it is their right to set up the locks, which should not be prohibited by legislation.
For the issue of residential parking spaces, the Property Law stipulates that the parking spaces and garages planned for parked cars should meet the needs of the owners first within the building zoning. The ownership of parking spaces and garages is stipulated by the parties through sales, bonuses, or rentals.
■Comments Off Ms. Liu: The above-ground space of the community is owned by all owners. The property company or individual private car owners are locked onto the ground to take possession of them. The first is a kind of infringement, and the second is for the elderly and children of the community. Insecurity has come, and even more serious is that the district’s roads have not been wide, and roadsides have been locked again. In the event of special circumstances within the community, fire engines and ambulances are difficult to access. We hope that the government can do so as soon as possible. Take effective measures to solve the problem of residential ground-mounted locks.
Ren Zhongyu: Suggestions (1) For the ground locks installed in public places, it is necessary to resolutely dismantle them in accordance with the law and impose fines. (2) For private residential parking spaces within the residential area, the owner of the parking space is allowed to legally install the lock. (3) For parking spaces belonging to property management and rented by residents in the community, locks should not be installed to improve the efficiency of the use of public resources.
Expert opinion The property parking space should not be locked. Sun Xianzhong, a researcher at the Institute of Law of the Chinese Academy of Social Sciences, has participated in the drafting and discussion of the legislation of the property law on many occasions. He believes that owners’ ownership of the property parking space can exclude others, and the installed piles and locks are The act of exercising ownership does not hinder others. If it is an open public parking space, setting up the ground stakes and locks will affect others and can be prohibited. Regarding the situation of renting parking spaces, Sun Xianzhong believes that during the lease period, the renter also has an exclusive right of use. As long as he has a valid use certificate, he cannot prohibit the setting up of piles and locks.
In the consultation opinions, there was a view that setting up ground stakes and locks on property rights or leased parking spaces may pose dangers to others, such as tripping old people and children, or affecting the passage of emergency vehicles when roads are not open during emergencies. To prevent this kind of problem, the land piles and ground locks should also be prohibited for property rights or leased parking spaces. Sun Xianzhong believes that this argument cannot be established because parking spaces are not roads and can not be constrained by the rules of road access, let alone assumed to be Parking is the road
We are the global complete road machinery solutions, integrating compaction machinery, earth-moving machinery, paving machinery, mixing machinery, maintenance machinery, etc., widely used in highways, railways, airports, bridges, mines, hydropower energy, telecommunications engineering, etc .all road roller spare parts ,Motor Grader Spare Parts ,Bulldozer Spare Parts etc.In all areas of facility construction, the products are exported to more than 100 countries and regions in Europe, America, Japan and South Korea, Southeast Asia, the Middle East, Africa, North and South America.
Road Machinery,Mining Excavators Digger,Custom Articulated Motor Grader,180Hp Motor Grader
Shandong Ocean Machinery Com.LTD , https://www.sdoceanmachine.com